Posted on October 27, 2025 by Nevil Speer
Source: Farm Progress. The original article is posted here.
This past Wednesday, in an interview with Ron Hays at the Oklahoma Farm Report , he asked me what I would share with POTUS about the business if he were on the other line. What a great question! What follows is an open letter that attempts to do just that and cut through all the noise.
Dear President Trump and Secretary Rollins,
During the past week, the beef industry has received an unprecedented amount of attention from mainstream media. The rhetoric distracts from what’s really occurring in the business. As such, it seems useful to review some of the underlying fundamentals.
Price:
Some context to frame the issue is especially important. Much of the attention and ensuing discussion around the issue is unnecessarily incendiary.
Inflation-adjusted retail beef prices (the measure that really matters) are up only ~8.5% versus 2015.
In comparison, real retail prices jumped 32% between 2010 and 2015.
Perhaps most importantly, beef spending as a percentage of disposable income remains essentially unchanged over time.
Supply:
Despite lots of claims to the contrary, higher prices are not being driven by reduced supply. Several items are significant here.
As a reference, domestic beef production bottomed out in 2015 at ~23.8B lb.
Beef production set a new record just several years ago (’22), and this year’s throughput will likely eclipse the 2015 low by more than 11%.
Many pundits are blaming higher retail prices on declining beef cow inventory. But that doesn’t translate to beef production because it doesn’t account for the industry’s perpetual gains in productivity. The beef industry continues to produce more beef with fewer cows over time.
Per capita supply (i.e., “consumption”) in 2025 will likely finish the year at 60+ lb — the highest level dating back to 2009 — and 11% bigger versus the 2015 low.
At the margin, the expanded Argentinian TRQ will likely displace some products imported from other countries. But even if it were all absorbed into the U.S., it would increase total beef supply by less than 0.5% (or ~5 oz/person — call it one hamburger). That’s not going to move the needle.
Related: Ranchers back Steve Pearce for BLM Director
Demand:
This is by far the most important dynamic occurring in 2025.
Meat shoppers are chasing quality and increasingly turning to beef. Monthly retail sales data consistently reveal beef to be the outperformer in 2025, garnering ~75% of every dollar of new spending.
That’s occurring in the face of growing supply from competitors (especially chicken). That is, if consumers were hesitant about price, they have many opportunities to make substitutionary purchases.
Kansas State University’s Monthly Meat Demand Monitor (MDM) continues to reveal that among 12 key purchasing attributes, taste is the single most important factor for consumers when making buying decisions. That dynamic inherently favors beef and explains the dynamic detailed above.
Some factions in the industry continue to promote the idea of country-of-origin labeling as a demand differentiator among consumers — and a potential driver to lower retail prices. That’s flawed thinking. Origin consistently ranks last, or next-to-last, among MDM’s 12 attributes. Moreover, it’s expensive. Tightening supplies helped drive the inflationary surge mentioned above (2010–2015); however, COOL was in the background, throwing gas on the fire.
Related: Corner crossing unsettled
During the past 40 years, the beef industry has worked tirelessly to improve the quality and consistency of its product. And as alluded to above, greater efficiency and productivity have also been key priorities. Consumers are benefitting from those efforts; they have ready access to more high-quality beef products at a better price/value relationship than ever.
It hasn’t always been like that. The beef industry’s turnaround story is worthy of being studied in every business school; there’s no other like it. It’s a testament to American innovation and can-do spirit. The lesson is straightforward: that success is wholly attributable to the power of free enterprise. Therefore, as it pertains to the current discussion, less is more. Doing nothing (i.e., let the free market work) is always better than something (i.e., government intervention).
Related: Rep. Hageman's bill would reinstate MCOOL for beef
Respectfully,
Nevil Speer, PhD, MBA
Bowling Green, KY