USCA comments on USDA rancher plan & unconfirmed imports

United States Cattlemen’s Association (USCA) welcomes USDA’s newly unveiled “Plan for American Ranchers and Consumers,” which outlines several positive steps for the nation’s livestock sector. USCA commends the unveiled concepts, such as the grazing action plan and predator management. USCA also underscores the important inclusion and enforcement of key existing tools in this plan—such as the recognition of protein’s role within federal dietary guidelines, meaningful support for small and independent processing facilities, and rigorous enforcement of voluntary labeling provisions. These priorities are closely aligned with longstanding industry concerns, and USCA appreciates USDA’s recognition of policies and programs that advance the interests of American cattle producers and consumers alike.

However, USCA is deeply concerned about reports that the Administration may move forward with a purchase of 80,000 metric tons of beef from Argentina—quadruple the existing import quota. “We oppose this kind of government intervention in the marketplace and will continue to defend ranchers from this action,” said Justin Tupper, President of USCA.

Following President Trump’s social media post today regarding ranchers, the market reacted. Both live and feeder cattle prices dropped dramatically, directly harming American producers. Despite the positive aspects of USDA’s plan, increasing beef imports poses an immediate and significant threat to U.S. ranchers. “We will remain vigilant and committed to representing U.S. cattle producers on this critical issue. USCA believes in America First, and that begins with standing shoulder to shoulder with the hardworking people who raise the safest, highest-quality beef in the world,” Tupper added. “A deal of this magnitude with Argentina would undercut the very foundation of our cattle industry. Flooding the market with imports would undermine U.S. cattle producers, drive down prices for family ranchers, and weaken the fabric of rural America. Our policies should strengthen American agriculture—not put it at greater risk.”

Related: Corner crossing unsettled