California board defines regenerative agriculture

After two years in the making, the California State Board of Food & Agriculture has approved and recommended a “regenerative agriculture” definition for the California Department of Food & Agriculture (CDFA). The purpose of the proposed definition, which has now been shared with Secretary Karen Ross, is to inform state agencies, boards and commissions on the definition as it relates to state policies and programs. However, the board emphasizes that it should not be used for certification or incorporation into state statute.

In a letter to Ross last week, California State Board of Food and Agriculture President Don Cameron notes, “Regenerative agriculture is not an endpoint, but a continuous implementation of practices that over time minimize inputs and environmental impacts and further enhances the ecosystem while maintaining or improving productivity, economic contributions and community benefits.”

The board recommends the definition be periodically revisited as new technologies, research and innovations occur. It also encourages state agencies and departments to coordinate with the CDFA on developing measurable and verifiable outcomes related to policies and programs that focus on regenerative agriculture.

In narrowing down the definition, the board also acknowledged the significant feedback received by constituents, specifically on using organic production as a foundation for regenerative agriculture. Cameron notes the current definition and its recommendations reflect the “diversity of agriculture in the state as well as an aspiration for expanded on-farm practices that provide an ongoing continuum of sustainability for California’s farmers and ranchers.”

Related: Farm Progress America, Jan. 10, 2025

California definition

“Defining Regenerative Agriculture for State Policies and Programs” is an integrated approach to farming and ranching rooted in the principles of soil health, biodiversity and ecosystem resiliency leading to improved targeted outcomes.

Examples of target outcomes include

Building soil health, organic matter and biodiversity

Increasing statewide implementation of conservation practices that improve soil health, sequester carbon and reduce greenhouse gases

Furthering sustainable pest and integrated pest management to reduce the reliance on pesticides

Protecting the welfare and care of animals in agriculture

Protecting spiritual and cultural traditions as well as supporting Native-led stewardship practices

Maintaining positive impact on the economic vitality/livelihoods of farmers and ranchers

The board advises regenerative agriculture practices should be considered an ongoing process, "informed by current science as well as the traditions and innovations from the original Indigenous stewards of the land.”

Related: Long term forecast: What's the next few months hold from a weather standpoint